
|
Day 12
Table of Contents
|
Controlling For Confounding Variables

"The validity of an experiment is a direct
function of the degree to which extraneous variables are controlled."
Gay, p 357.
Extraneous variables
- Also known as confounding variables
- May contribute to the results found during an
experiment
- They sneak in due to the selection of our
subjects, or the way the treatment is implemented
- Although we can't "control" these variables,
we can "control for" them with good designs
General methods to control for
confounding variables
- Use randomization. Although it does not
guarantee equal groups, it increases the chances all groups
will be similar:
- Randomly select subjects from the
population
- Randomly assign subjects to groups
- Randomly assign treatments to groups
- Hold constant environmental variables, such as
time of exposure, materials, and experience of instructors
- Equate groups on critical variables
- Match participants on variables related to
dependent variable, then randomly assign to groups (exclude
outliers)
- Categorize subjects into homogeneous
groups, then randomly assign
- Use Analysis
of Covariance--statistically
"equates" scores


Choosing a Design

The design you choose will determine the
statistics, threats to validity, and generalizability you can
state.
In choosing a design, use the following steps.
- Identify which is appropriate for your
hypothesis
- Identify which is feasible due to constraints
in the environment
- Identify which controls the most internal and
external invalidity
Use the following dichotomous key to determine the
type of experimental research. Start at the top, left
side.


Pre-Experimental Designs

Pre-experimental designs are the least valuable
because we have little control for confounding variables. Use only as
a last resort (and probably not even then).
One-Shot Case Study
- X O (Treatment, then test).
Almost all forms of invalidity are present (other than pretest
threat).
One-Group Pretest-Posttest
Design
- O X O (Pretest, treatment, posttest).
Without a control group, can't tell if results are due to
treatment. Only if dependent
variable is not likely to change by itself.
Static-Group Comparison


Quasi-Experimental Designs

Quasi-experimental designs do not use random
assignment: Use only when true experimental designs can not be
conducted. Try to ensure groups are as similar as possible.
Nonequivalent Control Group
Design
Time-Series Design
- O O O X2 O O O (Multiple pretests,
treatment, multiple posttests)
- Multiple tests necessitate that subjects are
used to testing. The analysis looks for trends in scores.
Counterbalanced Design
- X1 O X2 O X3
O
- X2 O X3 O X1
O
- X3 O X1 O X2
O (Multiple treatments and tests for all groups)
The number of groups must equal the number of
treatments. Employed when pretest is not possible, and intact
groups must be used. Exposure to one treatment may influence
subsequent treatments.


Experimental Designs

Experimental designs provide the best information
because each of these use random assignment of subjects to treatment
and control groups (and often random selection of subjects).
Pretest-Posttest Control
Group
- R O X1 O
- R O X2 O (Random assignment,
pretest, treatment, posttest)
Posttest-Only Control
Group
- R X1 O
- R X2 O (Random assignment,
treatment, posttest)
- Used with short studies when subjects have no
knowledge related to dependent variable. Mortality may be problem
because of lack of knowledge before treatment.
Solomon Four-Group
Study
- R O X1 O
- R O X2 O
- R X1 O
- R X2 O (Random assignment,
treatment, posttest)
- Has the advantages of both Pretest-Posttest
Control Group as well as Pretest-Only Control Group--it reduces
all forms of both internal and external validity. Requires twice
as many subjects. Not always needed.
Factorial Design
|
|
Factor
2
|
|
Factor
1
|
|
Level 1
|
Level
2
|
|
Level
1
|
Group 1
|
Group 2
|
|
Level
2
|
Group 3
|
Group 4
|
Factorial design analyzes two or more separate
independent variables (one is usually manipulated), and the
interaction between those variables.
- The non-manipulated (control) variable is
stratified to form the groups (ex. gender, IQ, age).
Drawback is the increased number of subjects. Advantage is
identifying potential interactions between the
factors.
Now that you know the types of design, test your
knowledge with this activity.


Single Subject Designs

Single subject designs are used when there is just
one (or only a few) subjects available.
Constraints
- each subject serves as their own control (time
series experiment)
- require multiple measurements during each
phase
- commonly used in behavior modification
research
Rationale
- not ethical to refuse treatment to control
group
- size of a population may be too small for
experimental research
- important in therapeutic, clinical settings;
not for generalizability


Closure; Review and Assignments

Review questions: (To find the
answers, click on the question mark icon)
How
do you determine which experimental design is best for your
topic?
Identify
three general techniques to reduce threats to validity.
Describe
the main differences between pre-experimental,
quasi-experimental,
and experimental
designs.
Given
a study description, determine the type of experimental design
employed by the researchers.
Under
what conditions is single subject design appropriate?
Before next
week:
- Read
469-491
in Chapter 13
- Complete Research Plan



For comments about this page, please contact Julie
Gallant