E-Game Evaluation RubricGame Being Evaluated: Evaluator: |
|
|
Beginning |
Developing |
Accomplished |
Exemplary |
Score |
|
|
0 The game doesn't seem to fit a well defined need in a realistic context |
1 There are several mismatches between the goals, audience, context and approach used. |
2 There are one or two mismatches between the goals, audience, context and approach used. |
4 The game seems to address a well described, plausible need in a way that the target audience would actually play. |
|
|
Details
|
0 It's not at all clear what the game will look like or exactly how it would be played. |
3 There are many missing details about interface, game rules, and the overall structure of the game. |
6 There are a few missing details about interface, game rules, and the overall structure of the game. |
9 All aspects of the game design are clearly described and illustrated graphically. |
|
|
|
0 The game's motivational elements are unclear or unconvincing. |
3 There is some uncertainty about the effectiveness or rationale behind the motivational elements chosen. |
6 There is a little uncertainty about the effectiveness or rationale behind the motivational elements chosen. |
9 The game would motivate its intended audience. The theory based used is well described. |
|
|
|
0 There is no account of the thought process used in putting the game together. |
1 The process used to design the game is sketchily described. |
2 The process used to design the game describes only the final result, not enough about the options considered and rejected. |
3 The design process is completely and interestingly described, including rationale, dead ends, and minority reports. |
|
|
COMMENTS
|
TOTAL
/25 |
||||