|
Career Development By Stephanie Morrison |
|||||||||
|
A successful career doesn't just happen: Career development as a non-training intervention is essential
toward achieving successful careers--both in the military services
and the corporate sector. Career development offers motivation to
individuals who are interested in achieving long-term career goals
and are looking toward the future. Through career development, an
individual is able to focus on the path he or she wishes to take.
While the corporate world may offer multiple ways to develop careers,
the military services provide concrete methods to plan an individual's
career through the promotion system, an individual's ability to
choose a specific career path, and mentoring. Career development spans an enormous scope, therefore, this paper
will focus on career development-specifically through the use of
mentoring--in the military services as a non-training intervention. What is mentoring? "Mentoring describes the process that is implemented to deliberately
pair two people who have unequal levels of a relevant set of skills
and experiences. The objective of this process is to transfer knowledge
and experience of these skills from the person who has more of them
to the person who has fewer" (Murray, p. 546). Mentoring is
extremely useful in any venue, but specifically to the military,
as pairing someone by rank, field of expertise, or experiences is
relatively easy to achieve. While many people confuse mentoring with job coaching, there is
a distinct difference in the military. Job coaching reflects assistance
at the task level. Unlike personal development or career sponsoring
(the other roles of a mentor), job coaching focuses on the task
at hand rather than long-term goals (Steinberg & Foley, 1999).
Mentoring focuses on the individual's career development through
a long-term approach. What does the literature say? According to research findings about mentoring in the Army: "The
greatest point of difference between the two communities [civilian
and military] is the support for the mentoring role of sponsor.
While it is clear mentor sponsoring does occur in the military,
the Army has not officially embraced the concept as a desirous activity
and has not included sponsoring as an aspect of leader development"
(Ritter, 1994, as cited by Steinberg & Foley, 1999). However,
in opposition to the Army's stance, the Coast Guard has taken a
very proactive role in regards to the mentoring program and officially
endorses it (U.S. Coast Guard, n.d.). Kopser quotes Army Lieutenant Colonel Gregg Martin in the break
down of mentoring into distinct categories (M1, M2, and M3) in a
military context (2002). M1 consists of the traditional teaching,
coaching and training that occur in most organizations. M2 is the
next level in which long-term personal and professional mentoring
takes place. This stage is marked by a two-way exchange of mutual
trust and respect and the relationship is at its strongest. In M3,
Martin suggests that the mentor begins to "grow and groom future
leaders." He feels that more networking takes place in this
stage then actual mentoring. A study conducted by Steinberg and Foley compiled data from 3,715
active Army senior non-commissioned officers and 4,876 active Army
commissioned officers who completed a survey asking about their
mentoring experiences in the army (1999). The survey results were
broken down and analyzed to show what constitutes mentoring, and
who mentors and who is mentored. The survey asked the respondent
to state whether his or her mentor provided 16 specific behaviors
including, "acts as a role model," "demonstrates
trust," "provides moral-ethical guidance." On average,
95% of the respondents indicated their mentor provided each of the
mentoring behaviors. Interesting results of the survey showed that there is no basis
for assuming that mentors demonstrate different behaviors based
on their gender or race. In addition, the research pointed out that
those in a command or leadership position did not have as great
interactive abilities as those in administrative positions, and
therefore, may not have acted as effective mentors. Finally, in addition to career development, positive outcomes from
mentoring were reported in productivity, development of skills,
cost savings, recruitment, retention, organizational image, and
strategic goals (Murray, 1999). How has career development through mentoring
evolved? Mentoring has always been an unofficial method of supporting career
development as a non-training intervention for members of the military.
According to GS-13 John Mauro, a retired U.S. Coast Guard Masterchief
(E-8), mentoring was a huge part of his career development and helped
him decide how he would spend his next 25 years in the Coast Guard
(J. Mauro, personal communication, February 2, 2004). He tells the
story: "I had three uncles in the Navy during World War II;
one was a cook, one was a Boatswain's mate, and one was a Quartermaster.
You can guess wish one took me under his wing and influenced my
career." His chuckles serve as a reminder that he spent a 25
year-career in the Coast Guard as a Quartermaster. Mauro also pointed out that mentoring fundamentally hasn't changed.
While the program was unofficial until 10 or 15 years ago, he feels
that had that program been around 30 years ago at the beginning
of his career, the same people would have stepped forward to serve
officially as mentors. In his words, "Mentoring works because you legitimately care
about the individual
and all aspects of his or her life."
Conclusion Career development through the use of mentoring works as a non-training
intervention-especially in the military--because it serves as a
way for individuals to look to the future and develop long-term
goals. Through its use, members of the service are able to see a
place for themselves in their organization with the assistance of
older, wiser, and/or more experienced role models. As a form of
motivation, career development instills a sense of confidence and
value to military members. References
Author Note
|
|||||||||