|
"Improper guidance and feedback are the single largest
contributors
to incompetence in the world of work, and a principal culprit
at school".
-- (Gilbert, 1978, p. 91)
What is a feedback system?
In its most basic form, feedback is information. A feedback system,
in the context of performance technology, is a means of
communication whereby the performer, whether it is an individual
or a group, receives information that guides their future actions,
in order to achieve a desired outcome. Feedback systems
can be used as part of an intervention in organizations to increase
awareness and improve performance.

The nature of feedback
Feedback may have either of two purposes: to influence the quality
or quantity of performance. Feedback that affects quality
of performance is called formative feedback, while feedback
that affects quantity of performance is called summative feedback.
In addition, feedback can encourage or discourage behavior depending
on what form it takes; positive feedback reinforces behavior
while negative feedback extinguishes it. In general, negative
feedback can result in an unpredictable substitution or change
of behavior (Tosti, 1986), and should be used with caution or
avoided altogether. As a rule, develop performance with formative
feedback, and encourage repeat performance with summative feedback.
Guidelines for effective
feedback
According to Tosti (1986) there are three general principles for
effective feedback. They are fit, focus and timing.
The following table offers basic guidelines to consider for creating
effective feedback:

Example of a feedback
systems intervention
The following example illustrates how feedback can be used as
an effective tool in improving performance in a real-world situation,
where safety is a challenge.
Behavioral Safety Programs (BSP) apply behavioral
science fundamentals to enhance workplace safety through increased
communication, employee involvement and behavior modification;
in other words, feedback. Companies that are interested in continuous
improvement in both quality and safety are increasingly implementing
this safety management tool.
The BSP approach is employee driven. In fact, employees
become the observers who provide feedback to their coworkers to
increase their awareness of their actions and to increase the
frequency of safe acts. Figure 1 is an example of how it works.
 |
Step One: An employee using
a checklist observes an employee or group of employees performing
a task and identifies safe behaviors and areas that can be
improved.
Step Two: The observer provides immediate feedback
to the employees, highlighting good behavior and suggesting
ideas to further improve the safety of that task.
Step Three: The employee records her observations
on a form located in a common area. If she has identified
any areas of concern, she will record the suggestion, which
will then be used in the next safety meeting or to establish
goals or targets for future activities.
Step Four: Model behaviors will be recorded so those
individuals may be submitted for awards or recognition.
|
Figure 1: Example of a feedback system
in BSP
Results: According to Moreno & Associates,
injury rates for BSP clients decrease as much as 50 to 70 percent.
Possible pitfall: Observer burnout is a possible
outcome of this program. In order for observers to maintain momentum,
they will also need positive feedback and reinforcement (Mathis,
2004).
What makes the feedback
system of BSP effective?
- It's a good fit. The most significant exposure to
injury is related to performance of site-specific at-risk behaviors
(Krause, 2004). Feedback, with direction, can improve performer
competence (Gilbert, 1978).
- Buy in at all levels. The fact that BSP are employee
driven is a major reason for program success. In addition, management
support is critical to successful implementation and longevity
(Krause, 2004).
- It's part of an overall solution. The feedback system
of BSP is just one component of an overall solution system,
which is tailored to the client's needs.
|
References
|
Gilbert, T.F. (1978). Human Competence: Engineering worthy performance.
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Krause, T.R. (2004). Behavior-based safety pitfalls and pointers.
. Industrial Safety & Hygiene News. Retreived February 2, 2004,
from http://www.ishn.com/CDA/Article_Information/BehavioralSafetyItem/0,3563,3322,00.html
Mathis, T. (2004). How to deal with observer burnout. Industrial
Safety & Hygiene News. Retrieved February 2, 2004, from http://www.ishn.com/CDA/Article_Information/BehavioralSafetyItem/0,3563,2783,00.html
Tosti, D.T. (1986). Feedback Systems. In Introduction to performance
technology (pp. 150-169). Washington, D.C: National Society for
Performance and Instruction.
|
Author
Note
|