|
Organizational Development By Helen V. Griffith |
|||||
|
"OD, as a field, began with a clear value bias: helping organizations
to be effective and healthy places in which to work", according
to Paula Griffin in her interim report on the values in practice
in OD (Griffin & Minors, 2004). OD is a values-based approach
to systems change in organizations and communities. It strives to
build the capacity to achieve and sustain a new desired state that
benefits the organization or community (Compass et al., 2004). OD is grounded in a set of core values and principles that guide
behavior and actions. Respect, collaboration, authenticity, self-awareness,
and empowerment are the key values-based principles that guide their
practice. OD is used to intervene in an organizational or community process
to help bring about positive change and help the client work toward
their desired goals. One such organization, The Centre for Organizational Effectiveness,
whose mission is to provide management and organization development,
uses the skill of their trained professionals to assess an organization's
needs and guide them to the appropriate technique to result in a
positive change. The value of The Centre's work rests in the improved
performance of the organization or department. Many times the outcome
results are measurable and offer empirical evidence that the organization
is better off after the intervention of a skilled OD professional. In a documentary funded by a grant from the Federal Government
in collaboration with Stanford University Research Institute, entitled
Total Performance Management, empirical evidence is presented on
the effectiveness of an Organization Development intervention. Within
the City of San Diego's Streets Division, OD professionals were
tasked to evaluate the department in an effort to improve productivity
and employee job satisfaction. OD professionals collected the data
necessary for a gap analysis and reported the findings to management,
since Organization Development interventions must always be driven
by analysis. Based on the findings conducted for the gap analysis, OD professionals
made recommendations to management for a selection of tailored,
non-training interventions. Included in the findings were pre-intervention
results of employee attitude data along with data on employee turnover.
The Centre then crafted and facilitated workshops in the following
areas, team building, conflict resolution, and optimum colleague
interaction, to name a few. With the assistance of the OD professionals,
each employee within the division developed a personal career action
plan for the purposes of advancing their career and improving job
satisfaction. Once the interventions were completed, after having utilized the
pre- and post-data, the Stanford University Research Institute conducted
a formal evaluation and validated the effectiveness of The Centre's
work. Overall, productivity improved along with employee morale.
According to The Centre's co-director, Dr. Trudy Sopp, organization
development professionals seek to identify the organization's problems,
and seek to identify and develop solutions. For example, employees
may be clear on their organizations goals and vision but may lack
the necessary equipment to adequately carry out the vision. OD professionals
will then gather data that will be analyzed to drive the solution.
She added, "Not all organizations require training.
Training allows for new skills, new tools, and new strategies.
What training does not provide is: a change in values, ideas,
or roles. Also, training interventions will not solve a loss in
morale or trust issues. Non-training interventions must be crafted
to provide an effective solution" (Sopp, 2004). OD is only as effective as the trained professionals, cautions
Dr. Sopp. "The skill of the professional can leave an organization
in better condition or unfortunately, in a less desirable state
than before the intervention was implemented" (Sopp, 2004).
References
Author Note
|
|||||