|
Electronic Performance Support Systems By Susan Mullen |
|||
|
An electronic performance support system (EPSS) may also be known
as electronic performance support, automated job aids, electronic
performance support tools, electronic coaches, intelligent online
help, performance centered design, embedded support, or enriched
learning environments. Performance support systems such as job aids have been a matter
of importance to performance technology for a long time. The availability
of computer technology, the increasing complexity of the workplace,
and the need for increased workplace performance to enable global
corporate competition are three factors that have lead to an increased
concern about how to most effectively design and develop performance
support tools in an electronic environment. The purpose of EPSS is to enable workers to perform a task or set
of tasks better by providing information and procedures when they're
needed, in the worker's natural environment. Providing performance
support "just-in-time," ( JIT) obviates the need for the
worker to store knowledge; they can access it as needed, and within
context. This is not only more convenient than out-of-context training,
but may allow better transfer of learning, because workers often
learn better in authentic performance settings. An EPSS can be simple, such as a system that provides a template
for a person giving telephone rate quotes, or it may be complex,
such as a system that supports operators of military communications
systems based on expert systems and artificial intelligence. Another
example of an EPSS is a software package that lets a homeowner design
a backyard deck, then generates a materials list. Gery (1991, in Gustafson, 2000) defined an EPSS as including four
elements: an information base, some form of advisor, tutorials,
and tools to assist the user. As Gustafson (2000) points out, information
bases may now included multiple knowledge sources, expert systems
or artificial intelligence may serve as advisors, tutorials may
be extensive and contain multimedia, and support tools have become
more sophisticated. When to use an EPSS An EPSS boasts a reduced need for training, integration of software
into performance, and a change in focus from knowing to performing
(Cole, Fischer, and Saltzman, 1997, in Stolovich and Keeps, 1999).
An EPSS adapts to the pace of the learner. Because users come and
go, an EPSS must accommodate the needs of the novice as well as
the more experienced user, without frustrating either audience.
Users are coming to expect shallow learning curves and high performance,
even among novices (Gery, 1997, in Stolovich and Keeps, 1999). As Gustafson proposes, the relevant question is "what are
the respective roles of job design, training, and EPSS and how do
they complement each other in promoting high quality performance?" The EPSS must be considered in relation to other interventions,
such as training, supervision, and mentoring. Documentation is still
scarce about how to create an EPSS, partly due to intellectual capital
concerns in the marketplace, and partly because EPSS technology
is still immature -- many creative EPSSs are not based on empirical
evidence. A review of literature by Reeves (n.d.) reveals some questions
to ask when considering whether an EPSS is an appropriate solution
to a performance problem: Designing or selecting an EPSS Gustafson outlines seven different design considerations when selecting
or creating an EPSS: How well does an EPSS work? An EPSS is not a magic bullet, and measuring ROI for an EPSS is
as important as for other interventions. The cost of an EPSS is
primarily incurred during the initial development. While delivery
costs may be lower than that of traditional training, it is more
difficult to track them. Performance support occurs at the same
time as the employee's performance, in contrast to traditional training,
which is normally finite and easier to isolate from the cost of
performing the work itself. Because most of the cost of an EPSS
is up-front (during implementation), the ROI for an EPSS increases
the longer the system is used. An EPSS can also eliminate the costs
associated with traditional training, such as travel expense and
classroom space. Hawkins, Gustafson, and Nielsen (1998) created a web-based EPSS
ROI calculator for use by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Some benefits of an EPSS tracked in an example web-based ROI calculator
were: New employees: Continuing employees: Quality benefits: The sample calculations with data are provided here. Unfortunately,
the data are only samples, presumably because the author cannot
provide actual government data. The sample numbers are impressive,
but not verifiable. The success of an EPSS depends on both technical and organizational
factors. The number of users, the availability of domain experts
and EPSS implementation specialists, and the appropriateness of
the tasks themselves to EPSS support are important factors. To successfully
complete an EPSS, skills are needed in the areas of instructional
analysis and design, technical analysis, online writing, programming,
and graphic art, as well as subject matter expertise. An interesting case study provides many examples of unfortunate
unintended consequences of implementing an EPSS, in this case in
a hospital setting (Mauldin, 1996). The vendor who created the system
did not understand the environment the system would be used in,
and they expected the workers to modify their behavior to fit the
system, rather than supporting workers in their normal context.
Multiple hardware incompatibility issues arose, requiring the hospital
to upgrade their hardware and train the users on the new operating
system (Windows NT). Clinicians could not go to the computer and wait for test results
when urgent medical issues faced them. In addition, the "customizable"
system was set up so only one person in the IT department could
modify the system. The workload was much bigger than anticipated,
so the hospital ended up hiring staff to maintain the new EPSS.
A poor interface design resulted in the inability of users to correct
errors in data entry. This required support staff to spend a large
amount of time checking for errors. Some user groups refused to
participate in adopting the system. This meant that, in one example,
the software could not create the intended graphs and charts because
one department's staff would not supply the missing data that enabled
reporting of grouped information. These unfortunate circumstances lead the authors to make the following
recommendations when implementing an EPSS: References
Author Note
|
|||